EXPLORING THE JURIDICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABLE PROGRESS IN THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Authors

  • Usman Tahir Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Jayapura, Indonesia
  • Ramdan Yusuf Universitas Madako Tolitoli, Indonesia
  • Gunawan Widjaja Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Hadenan Towpek Universiti Teknologi Mara Cawangan Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Ekha Sri Sugiarti SLBN 2 Kota Pasuruan, Indonesia

Keywords:

Environmental Conservation, Infrastructure Development, Sustainable Progress, Juridical Framework, Indonesia, Environmental Impact Assessments, Government Policies.

Abstract

This paper delves into the intricate juridical framework governing environmental conservation within the dynamic context of infrastructure development and the pursuit of sustainable progress in the Republic of Indonesia. As Indonesia experiences rapid economic growth and urbanization, driven by ambitious infrastructure projects, it confronts a challenging dichotomy—simultaneously fostering development and preserving its ecological riches. This study offers an extensive examination of Indonesia's legal landscape, encompassing environmental laws, regulations, policies, and practical implementation and enforcement mechanisms. It scrutinizes the critical role of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) in navigating the environmental consequences of infrastructure ventures. Additionally, it explores government policies and international commitments that underscore Indonesia's dedication to sustainability. The paper highlights the intrinsic connection between environmental conservation and sustainable progress, emphasizing the importance of responsible resource management and ecological preservation in achieving long-term development objectives. By analyzing case studies, policy implications, and future research directions, this research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how Indonesia can harmonize its infrastructure development ambitions with the imperative of environmental protection, ultimately guiding the nation toward a more sustainable and equitable future.

References

Alamgir, M., Campbell, M. J., Sloan, S., Suhardiman, A., Supriatna, J., & Laurance, W. F. (2019). High-risk infrastructure projects pose imminent threats to forests in Indonesian Borneo. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 140.

Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., Sarshar, M., & Newton, R. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach. Work study, 51(1), 17-31.

Arifin, S. R. M. (2018). Ethical considerations in qualitative study. International journal of care scholars, 1(2), 30-33.

Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 21(3), 63–64.

Bastos Lima, M. G., Kissinger, G., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Braña-Varela, J., & Gupta, A. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and REDD+: Assessing institutional interactions and pursuing synergies. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17, 589-606.

Bolton, R., & Hannon, M. (2016). Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: Towards a systems understanding. Research Policy, 45(9), 1731-1742.

Chi, C. S., Ruuska, I., & Xu, J. (2016). Environmental impact assessment of infrastructure projects: a governance perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(3), 393-413.

Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business strategy and the environment, 28(1), 206-220.

Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Evers, S., Yule, C. M., Padfield, R., O'Reilly, P., & Varkkey, H. (2017). Keep wetlands wet: the myth of sustainable development of tropical peatlands–implications for policies and management. Global Change Biology, 23(2), 534–549.

Fuso Nerini, F., Sovacool, B., Hughes, N., Cozzi, L., Cosgrave, E., Howells, M., ... & Milligan, B. (2019). Connecting climate action with other Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(8), 674–680.

Ji, L., Huang, J., Liu, Z., Zhu, H., & Cai, Z. (2012). The effects of employee training on the relationship between environmental attitude and firms' performance in sustainable development. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(14), 2995–3008.

Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., ... & Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 31, 1-32.

Krishnaiah, V., Narsimha, G., & Chandra, N. S. (2014). Survey of classification techniques in data mining. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 2(9), 65–74.

Law, A., De Lacy, T., Lipman, G., & Jiang, M. (2016). Transitioning to a green economy: The case of tourism in Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 111, 295–305.

Li, T. H., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2012). Public participation in infrastructure and construction projects in China: From an EIA-based to a whole-cycle process. Habitat International, 36(1), 47–56.

Livesley, S. J., McPherson, E. G., & Calfapietra, C. (2016). The urban forest and ecosystem services: Impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. Journal of Environmental Quality, 45(1), 119–124.

Manakane, S. E., Latue, P. C., Somae, G., & Rakuasa, H. (2023). The Role of Geography Research in Supporting Sustainable Development in Ambon City, Indonesia: A Review. Sinergi International Journal of Economics, 1(2), 64-75.

Mansell, P., & Philbin, S. (2020). Measuring sustainable development goal targets on infrastructure projects. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 8(1).

Markolf, S. A., Helmrich, A., Kim, Y., Hoff, R., & Chester, M. (2022). Balancing efficiency and resilience objectives in pursuit of sustainable infrastructure transformations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 56, 101181.

Mills‐Novoa, M., & Liverman, D. M. (2019). Nationally determined contributions: material climate commitments and discursive positioning in the NDCs. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(5), e589.

Overdevest, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2018). Experimentalism in transnational forest governance: Implementing European Union forest law enforcement, governance and trade (FLEGT) voluntary partnership agreements in Indonesia and Ghana. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 64-87.

Palyanova, N. V., Zadkov, D. A., & Chubukova, S. G. (2017). Legal framework for the sustainable economic and ecological development in the coal industry in Russia. Eurasian mining, 1(3).

Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., & Badger, T. A. (2018). Two strategies for qualitative content analysis: An intramethod approach to triangulation. Qualitative health research, 28(5), 824–831.

Roach, B., & Walker, T. R. (2017). Aquatic monitoring programs conducted during environmental impact assessments in Canada: preliminary assessment before and after weakened environmental regulation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, pp. 189, 1–11.

Roth, D., Boelens, R., & Zwarteveen, M. (2015). Property, legal pluralism, and water rights: the critical analysis of water governance and the politics of recognizing “local” rights. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 456-475.

Rusmayadi, G., Mokodenseho, S., & Salawati, U. (2023). Nature's Last Defense: Preserving Biodiversity in the Face of Climate Chaos in Rural Sukabumi District. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 1(03), 127-134.

Sandee, H. (2016). Improving connectivity in Indonesia: The challenges of better infrastructure, better regulations, and better coordination. Asian Economic Policy Review, 11(2), 222–238.

Singh, K. D. (2015). Creating your qualitative research approach: Selecting, integrating, and operationalizing philosophy, methodology, and methods. Vision, 19(2), 132–146.

Tomislav, K. (2018). The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 21(1), 67–94.

Valverde, M. (2015). Chronotopes of law: Jurisdiction, scale, and governance. Routledge.

Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047.

Wilcox, A. B., Gallagher, K. D., Boden-Albala, B., & Bakken, S. R. (2012). Research data collection methods: from paper to tablet computers. Medical care, S68-S73.

Zain, A. F., Pribadi, D. O., & Indraprahasta, G. S. (2022). Revisiting the Green City concept in the Tropical and Global South Cities context: The case of Indonesia. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 45.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-10

How to Cite

Tahir, U., Yusuf, R. ., Widjaja, G. ., Towpek, H. ., & Sri Sugiarti, E. . (2023). EXPLORING THE JURIDICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABLE PROGRESS IN THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA. International Journal Of Humanities, Social Sciences And Business (INJOSS), 3(1), 196–209. Retrieved from https://www.injoss.org/index.php/joss/article/view/118

Issue

Section

Articles